Let’s take a very common situation that we run into in Canada. Let’s take two kids - Jimmy and Billy.
Billy turned 15 in January. Throughout his youth, he has had limited involvement in hockey and other stick and ball sports. Rather, Billy has been playing golf every summer since he was 6 and year round since he was 10. Billy is regarded as one of the top juniors at the 15 and under level. He has already garnered scholarship interest from many Division I schools.
Jimmy turns 15 in October. Jimmy played ‘AAA’ hockey for 5 years; however, he was cut from his ‘AAA’ team this season, as he simply wasn’t good enough – he grew significantly during the previous season, which greatly affected his skating. Jimmy also played tennis recreationally in the summer. He took up golf with his buddies last summer and realized that he really enjoyed the game, as it was a great way to get away from the hard hitting in hockey. Frustrated with hockey; he chose to direct his attention towards golf. Fully committed to golf and despite never playing in any competitions, he entered a year round coaching program.
So, who has talent?
In this situation, there is no right answer, but there is no question of who is the better golfer now.
Talent, howevere, produces images of ability or competitive advantages that are largely uncultivated or raw. In essence, talent is potential yet to be realized/trained. However, we most commonly use performance as a means to identify talent. Why does this matter?
Think of the golf talent pool. Talent is identified by score and performance at a young age, which isn't wrong. Most strong performers choose to train their golf skills in lieu of playing other sports. Often times, the top juniors between 8 and 12 haven’t hit their Peak Height Velocity and because of their golf-centric focus, don’t possess strong athletic backgrounds/physical literacy. Think about it, imagine being the top player in your age group, and then all of a sudden, having your bones grow at different rates than tendons, etc. What would that do to your game? Coordination? Imagine if every shot felt as if it were 3 or 4 inches below your feet. Would that impact your performance? Now think about how those changes in performance would affect your confidence? It’s a pretty hard fall from the top, even for kids. That being said, if we as coaches are conscious of this and proactive in monitoring PHV, competition schedules can be managed and you can bring your athletes back into your safe environment to develop coordination, speed, range of motion and their scoring skills. Try and be aware of PHV when reading the next paragraph.
To take a page from ‘Outliers’ by Gladwell, most NHL players are born between January and March, making them the oldest in their birth year, which is undoubtedly a huge competitive advantage when competing against kids born in December of the same year. What is the January-March of golf? In Canada, it would be September – December, as that buys them an extra year of U17 and U19 golf given the cut-off dates for our championships, making them more of a force when competing against kids in the same age division, but born in the summer months of the following year. It also allows them to come back to Canada after their freshman year in College and compete in junior golf. Or, as many kids in Canada do, it allows them to take a year off after high school to train, and compete as an ‘over-ager’ in junior golf.
Why is this relevant in identifying talent and our scenario?
Billy, while highly skilled, will be approaching a very difficult time in his development, especially given his lack of athletic background. PHV degrades motor skills, and unless he is conscious of what is about to happen, and is proactive in managing his schedule and training, he risks completely losing his confidence and (potentially) scholarship opportunities. He also doesn’t have the option of the extra year of junior golf, so he may feel pressured to continue with his traditionally heavy competition schedule - not good – especially given the body’s fragility during growth, which exposes him to overuse injuries should he push too hard.
Jimmy clearly has a great opportunity in front of him. Having gone through a rapid growth spurt, and trained heavily for hockey during that time, was able to develop his speed, coordination and angular/rotational striking skills, which transfer nicely into golf. Coming from the hyper competitive world of ‘AAA’ hockey, he possesses strong competitive instincts and work ethic in addition to his speed and overall athleticism. Lastly, his birthday buys him extra time in junior golf – with a strong coaching program and his natural athletic instincts; he can rise quickly if managed correctly.
Again, it’s very obvious who the best player is now. But who has more upside? Is being the best player in the world as a kid a key determinant of future success? These are tough questions that can be argued from both sides, as Billy can be successful if managed correctly.
“Training always beats talent until talent trains.”
The key to long term player development (and the health of the game) is identifying untrained talent, like Jimmy, who would otherwise go by the wayside, and being conscious of PHV and its impact on motor skills in protecting our highly skilled young athletes. Being proactive in measuring golf-specific KPI’s like clubhead speed and simple physiological KPI’s like vertical jump at the grassroots level can funnel an entirely new brand of athlete into the game.
I’m curious to hear what other coaches think about talent ID, and the relationship between trained skill and talent.
Please leave comments discussing how you define and measure talent.